Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro FX 4800
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro FX 4800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro FX 4800.
Quadro FX 4800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1472 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 252 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 73% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 112% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 72 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |