Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro FX 4800

    If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro FX 4800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 stacks up against Quadro FX 4800, check out specs charts below.
    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price
    Quadro FX 4800

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Quadro FX 4800
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type System Shared GDDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
      Check Price
    • Quadro FX 4800 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 302 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 4−5 2−3
    ultra / 1080p 3−4 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 12−14 12−14
    medium / 1080p 5−6 3−4
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800.

    Full Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Quadro FX 4800
    Architecture Gen. 8 Broadwell Tesla 2.0
    Code name Broadwell GT3e GT200B
    Type Laptop Workstation
    Release date 2 June 2015 11 November 2008
    Pipelines 48 192
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 602 MHz
    Boost Clock 1150 MHz
    Transistor count 189 million 1,400 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 55 nm
    Texture fill rate 40.80 38.53
    Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 462.3 gflops
    Length 267 mm
    Memory bus width 384 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 11.1 (10_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 4.0
    OpenGL 4.4 3.3
    OpenCL 2.0 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.80 N/A
    CUDA 1.3
    Laptop size medium sized
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price

    Similar compares