Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro FX 4800
When comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro FX 4800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro FX 4800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 4800 - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 105% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 175% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 420% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 60% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 August 2020 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce 830M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760