Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K2000M
When choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2000M.
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 143 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 3% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro K2000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | N14P-Q3 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 23.84 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 572.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |