Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K3000M
When choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K3000M.
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 52 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |