Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K4100M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K4100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K4100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro K4100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Quadro K4100M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 104 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K4100M is 1600 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 121% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 187% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 21% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro K4100M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | N15E-Q3-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1152 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 67.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |