Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K620M
When comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K620M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K620M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 427 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K620M is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | GT200B | GM108 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |