Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro P3200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro P3200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro P3200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 6084 MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 4548 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 106 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 5408 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 912% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 1175% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 487% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 814% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 377% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 1466% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1183% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1280% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | GT200B | N18E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 27 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |