Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon 520
When comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon 520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon 520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon 520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 428 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon 520 is 650 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon 520 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 21 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 20.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Check Price |