Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon Pro 450
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro 450. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro 450. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 198 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 3480 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 275% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 237% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200B | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |