Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 4800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 460.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 298 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 325% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 480% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | GT200B | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 8 August 2016 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 58.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |