Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon Pro 560
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro 560, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 4800 stacks up against Radeon Pro 560, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 305 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 3480 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 325% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |