Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon Pro 560X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro 560X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 4800 stacks up against Radeon Pro 560X, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 305 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 3480 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 128% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Far Cry 5 is 525% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 212% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 27% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 21 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 64.26 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |