Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 130% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 480 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 262% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 81% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 143% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 212% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 111% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |