Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M390X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M390X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M390X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M390X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M390X is 121 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M390X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 512% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 268% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | GT200B | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |