Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
When choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Fortnite is 94% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GT200B | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce 830M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K4000M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs FirePro M5100
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro K4000M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs FirePro M5100