Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 4800 stacks up against Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 237% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GT200B | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 192 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1750 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce 830M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 780M