Quadro FX 4800 vs Tesla M60
When comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Tesla M60, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Tesla M60 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Tesla M60
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Tesla M60 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M60 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1528 GB more memory, than Tesla M60.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 45 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla M60 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 3412 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 716% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 875% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Tesla M60 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 1150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 468% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 771% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 372% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 1400% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1180% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GT200B | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |