Quadro FX 4800 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
When comparing Quadro FX 4800 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 302 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Fortnite is 42% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | GT200B | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 28 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs GeForce 830M
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640