Quadro FX 5800 vs Radeon Pro 460
In this comparison between Quadro FX 5800 and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 5800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 5800
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
189 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro FX 5800 has 440% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Quadro FX 5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro FX 5800 and Radeon Pro 460 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro FX 5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro FX 5800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 290 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.
Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
20−22
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−33
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 152% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
7−8
30−33
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 236% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
9−10
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 262% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
Full Specs
Quadro FX 5800
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Polaris
Code name
GT200B
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
11 November 2008
8 August 2016
Pipelines
240
1024
Core clock speed
610 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
907 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
48.80
58.05
Floating-point performance
622.1 gflops
1,858 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
512 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
1.3
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
