Quadro FX 5800 vs Radeon R9 270

When comparing Quadro FX 5800 and Radeon R9 270, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 5800 and Radeon R9 270 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Main Specs

  Quadro FX 5800 Radeon R9 270
Power consumption (TDP) 189 Watt 150 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin 1 x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro FX 5800 has 26% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 270.
  • Quadro FX 5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 270 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Quadro FX 5800 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 270.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Quadro FX 5800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 270 - with GCN 1.0.
  • Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 270 - by 28 nm process technology.
  • Quadro FX 5800 is 57 mm longer, than Radeon R9 270.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 3−4 21−24
ultra / 1080p 1−2 12−14
QHD / 1440p 0−1 7−8
4K / 2160p 5−6
low / 720p 14−16 40−45
medium / 1080p 5−6 27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Quadro FX 5800.

Full Specs

  Quadro FX 5800 Radeon R9 270
Architecture Tesla 2.0 GCN 1.0
Code name GT200B Curacao
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 11 November 2008 13 November 2013
Pipelines 240 1280
Core clock speed 610 MHz
Boost Clock 925 MHz
Transistor count 1,400 million 2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 48.80 74.00
Floating-point performance 622.1 gflops 2,368 gflops
Length 267 mm 210 mm
Memory bus width 512 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 179.2 GB/s
DirectX 11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model 4.0 5.1
OpenGL 3.3 4.6
OpenCL 1.1 1.2
Vulkan N/A +
CUDA 1.3
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 293 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
TrueAudio +
Design reference
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
DDMA audio +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 16 Mh/s
LiquidVR +
TressFX +
UVD +
  Check Price Check Price