Quadro FX 5800 vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
When comparing Quadro FX 5800 and Radeon RX 460 mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 5800 and Radeon RX 460 mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 5800
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
189 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro FX 5800 has 243% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
Quadro FX 5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro FX 5800 and Radeon RX 460 mobile have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro FX 5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
Quadro FX 5800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
Quadro FX 5800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 4400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
20−22
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
180−190
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
60−65
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−33
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
4−5
20−22
ultra / 1080p
4−5
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 142% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 218% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
9−10
30−35
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 157% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
Full Specs
Quadro FX 5800
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Polaris
Code name
GT200B
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
11 November 2008
8 August 2016
Pipelines
240
896
Core clock speed
610 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
48.80
66.08
Floating-point performance
622.1 gflops
2,115 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
512 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1600 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
1.3
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
