FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K1000M
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Quadro K1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Quadro K1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 64% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K1000M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 160 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
low / 768p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 120% more, than Quadro K1000M. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Quadro K1000M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Juniper | N14P-Q1 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |