FirePro W4100 vs Quadro K1000M
When comparing FirePro W4100 and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4100 and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4100
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4100 has 11% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
FirePro W4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4100 and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W4100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 220 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4100 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
1−2
medium / 1080p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
110−120
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
7−8
QHD / 1440p
30−33
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
80−85
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
10−11
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
0−1
low / 768p
50−55
18−20
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
90−95
27−30
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
24−27
0−1
medium / 768p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
14−16
ultra / 1080p
20−22
0−1
high / 768p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4100 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4100
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
GCN
Kepler
Code name
Cape Verde
N14P-Q1
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
512
192
Core clock speed
630 MHz
850 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
20.16
13.60
Floating-point performance
645.1 gflops
326.4 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Form factor
low profile / half length
Dual-link DVI support
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price