FirePro W4190M vs Quadro K1000M
When comparing FirePro W4190M and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W4190M and Quadro K1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W4190M and Quadro K1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4190M and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
0−1
ultra / 1080p
1−2
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
1−2
medium / 1080p
5−6
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
120−130
60−65
medium / 768p
95−100
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
7−8
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
high / 768p
70−75
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
20−22
0−1
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
75−80
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
10−11
ultra / 1080p
27−30
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
3−4
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
14−16
0−1
medium / 1080p
5−6
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 159% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
18−20
high / 1080p
8−9
0−1
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
−
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
0−1
medium / 1080p
3−4
−
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
high / 1080p
65−70
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Minecraft is 45% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
0−1
low / 768p
16−18
0−1
medium / 768p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 768p
70−75
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
0−1
high / 768p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
GCN
Kepler
Code name
Mars XTX?
N14P-Q1
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
12 November 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
384
192
Core clock speed
825 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
13.60
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
326.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price