FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K1000M
When comparing FirePro W5000 and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W5000 and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5000
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W5000 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
FirePro W5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro W5000 and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W5000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro W5000.
FirePro W5000 and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W5000 is 1400 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
1−2
medium / 1080p
18−20
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
0−1
medium / 1080p
27−30
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p
210−220
60−65
medium / 768p
180−190
27−30
ultra / 1080p
95−100
7−8
QHD / 1440p
50−55
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
140−150
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 471% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
40−45
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p
110−120
45−50
medium / 768p
90−95
10−11
ultra / 1080p
60−65
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
21−24
medium / 1080p
50−55
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
0−1
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
low / 720p
50−55
0−1
medium / 1080p
27−30
0−1
low / 768p
85−90
18−20
medium / 768p
75−80
−
high / 1080p
30−33
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
low / 720p
55−60
8−9
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 768p
55−60
0−1
medium / 768p
30−35
−
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
high / 768p
50−55
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
FirePro W5000
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Pitcairn
N14P-Q1
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 August 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
768
192
Core clock speed
825 MHz
850 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
39.60
13.60
Floating-point performance
1,267 gflops
326.4 gflops
Length
183 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3200 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
154 Mh/s
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / half length
DisplayPort count
2
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price