Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro W7000 vs Quadro K1000M

    When comparing FirePro W7000 and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7000 and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro W7000 Check Price
    Quadro K1000M Check Price

    Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:

    Quadro K1000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro W7000 Quadro K1000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 45 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro W7000 has 677% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
    • FirePro W7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
    • FirePro W7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
    • FirePro W7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
    • Core clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 100 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
    • FirePro W7000 and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 21−24 0−1
    ultra / 1080p 12−14 −
    QHD / 1440p 6−7 0−1
    4K / 2160p 5−6 −
    low / 720p 40−45 1−2
    medium / 1080p 24−27 0−1
    The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Quadro K1000M.

    Full Specs

      FirePro W7000 Quadro K1000M
    Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
    Code name Pitcairn N14P-Q1
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 13 June 2012 1 June 2012
    Pipelines 1280 192
    Core clock speed 950 MHz 850 MHz
    Transistor count 2,800 million 1,270 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 76.00 13.60
    Floating-point performance 2,432 gflops 326.4 gflops
    Length 242 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4800 MHz 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 153.6 GB/s 28.8 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
    CUDA +
    Bus support PCIe 3.0
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 285 Mh/s 10 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Optimus +
    Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 6 Mh/s
    Form factor full height / full length
    StereoOutput3D +
    DisplayPort count 4
    Dual-link DVI support +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares