FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K1000M
When comparing FireStream 9250 and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9250
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Quadro K1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 233% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K1000M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 225 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 186 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than Quadro K1000M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Quadro K1000M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N14P-Q1 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |