GeForce GTX 275 vs Quadro K1000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 275 and Quadro K1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 275 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 275 has 386% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 894 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 275 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 554 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 666 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
1−2
medium / 1080p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
100−110
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
7−8
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
75−80
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 228% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
10−11
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
8−9
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
0−1
low / 768p
50−55
18−20
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
4−5
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
high / 1080p
85−90
27−30
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
10−12
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
24−27
0−1
medium / 768p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
40−45
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
high / 768p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in World of Tanks is 120% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 275
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Kepler
Code name
GT200B
N14P-Q1
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
15 January 2009
1 June 2012
Pipelines
240
192
Core clock speed
1404 MHz
850 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.6 billion/sec
13.60
Floating-point performance
673.9 gflops
326.4 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1134 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
127.0 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
3.0
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
