GeForce GTX 670MX vs Quadro K1000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670MX and Quadro K1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670MX will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 670MX and Quadro K1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX and Quadro K1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX or Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 670MX has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
GeForce GTX 670MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 670MX has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 670MX and Quadro K1000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 250 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
GeForce GTX 670MX and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 400 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
1−2
medium / 1080p
10−12
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2000% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
150−160
60−65
medium / 768p
130−140
27−30
ultra / 1080p
65−70
7−8
QHD / 1440p
35−40
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
95−100
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 303% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
65−70
10−11
ultra / 1080p
40−45
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 720p
70−75
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−33
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Fortnite is 227% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
0−1
low / 768p
60−65
18−20
medium / 768p
50−55
−
high / 1080p
16−18
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
95−100
27−30
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in Minecraft is 83% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
35−40
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
30−35
0−1
medium / 768p
21−24
−
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
high / 768p
40−45
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
N13E-GR
N14P-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 October 2012
1 June 2012
Pipelines
960
192
Core clock speed
600 MHz
850 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
48.0 billion/sec
13.60
Floating-point performance
1,154 gflops
326.4 gflops
Memory bus width
192 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
67.2 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
960
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Optimus
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
