GeForce GTX 760 vs Quadro K1000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760 and Quadro K1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 760 has 277% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
GeForce GTX 760 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 760 and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
GeForce GTX 760 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 760 and Quadro K1000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 is 130 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
GeForce GTX 760 and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
24−27
0−1
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
45−50
1−2
medium / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4600% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
35−40
−
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
75−80
0−1
medium / 1080p
40−45
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 760 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
240−250
60−65
medium / 768p
210−220
27−30
ultra / 1080p
130−140
7−8
QHD / 1440p
100−110
−
4K / 2160p
60−65
−
high / 768p
180−190
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 596% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
GeForce GTX 760 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
45−50
medium / 768p
110−120
10−11
ultra / 1080p
85−90
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
−
QHD / 1440p
21−24
−
4K / 2160p
9−10
−
low / 720p
60−65
0−1
medium / 1080p
30−35
−
high / 1080p
35−40
−
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
low / 720p
140−150
21−24
medium / 1080p
85−90
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Fortnite is 559% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
40−45
0−1
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
0−1
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
low / 720p
80−85
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
0−1
low / 768p
110−120
18−20
medium / 768p
100−110
−
high / 1080p
45−50
0−1
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Grand Theft Auto V is 505% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
12−14
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Minecraft is 62% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
80−85
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 925% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
low / 768p
90−95
0−1
medium / 768p
55−60
−
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
45−50
0−1
high / 768p
55−60
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK104
N14P-Q1
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
25 June 2013
1 June 2012
Pipelines
1152
192
Core clock speed
980 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
94.1 billion/sec
13.60
Floating-point performance
2,378 gflops
326.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
1152
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
83 Mh/s
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3.5 Mh/s
Blu Ray 3D
+
Minimum recommended system power
500 Watt
PhysX
+
Check Price
Check Price