GeForce GTX 760A vs Quadro K1000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K1000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760A stacks up against Quadro K1000M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 760A
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 22% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K1000M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 222 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2208 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 214% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Minecraft is 50% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 287% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Quadro K1000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK106 | N14P-Q1 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |