GRID K220Q vs Quadro K1000M
When choosing between GRID K220Q and Quadro K1000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K220Q and Quadro K1000M.
GRID K220Q
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro K1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro K1000M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Dota 2 is 96% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Fortnite is 113% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Minecraft is 35% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro K1000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | N14P-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |