GRID K260Q vs Quadro K1000M
When comparing GRID K260Q and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Quadro K1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro K1000M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 471% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 340% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Quadro K1000M. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Quadro K1000M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | N14P-Q1 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |