GRID M6 8Q vs Quadro K1000M
When choosing between GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K1000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K1000M.
GRID M6 8Q
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Quadro K1000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 122% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 128 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 3212 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | − |
4K / 2160p | 40−45 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GRID M6 8Q and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 422% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro K1000M. |
Full Specs
GRID M6 8Q | Quadro K1000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | N14P-Q1 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 722 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |