Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro K1000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro K1000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 580 stacks up against Quadro K1000M, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro K1000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro K1000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 or Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K1000M has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
1−2
medium / 1080p
10−12
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2000% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
150−160
60−65
medium / 768p
130−140
27−30
ultra / 1080p
65−70
7−8
QHD / 1440p
35−40
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
95−100
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 303% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
70−75
10−11
ultra / 1080p
40−45
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 720p
70−75
21−24
medium / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 227% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
0−1
low / 768p
60−65
18−20
medium / 768p
50−55
−
high / 1080p
16−18
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
95−100
27−30
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 83% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
35−40
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
30−35
0−1
medium / 768p
21−24
−
high / 1080p
10−12
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
high / 768p
40−45
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Kepler
Code name
Skylake GT4e
N14P-Q1
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
72
192
Core clock speed
350 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
13.60
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
