Quadro 2000D vs Quadro K1000M
When comparing Quadro 2000D and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000D and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro K1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000D has 37% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K1000M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000D is 800 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in Minecraft is 64% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000D in World of Tanks is 88% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000D | Quadro K1000M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | GF106 | N14P-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 October 2011 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Length | 178 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | 10 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |