Quadro 6000 vs Quadro K1000M
When comparing Quadro 6000 and Quadro K1000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 6000 and Quadro K1000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 6000
Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 6000 has 353% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro 6000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro 6000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro 6000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro 6000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 276 MHz higher, than Quadro 6000.
Quadro 6000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro 6000 is 1188 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
1−2
medium / 1080p
16−18
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p
200−210
60−65
medium / 768p
170−180
27−30
ultra / 1080p
90−95
7−8
QHD / 1440p
50−55
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
130−140
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 6000.
low / 768p
100−110
45−50
medium / 768p
90−95
10−11
ultra / 1080p
60−65
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
90−95
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Fortnite is 318% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
0−1
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
0−1
medium / 1080p
27−30
0−1
low / 768p
80−85
18−20
medium / 768p
70−75
−
high / 1080p
27−30
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
110−120
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 720p
50−55
8−9
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 768p
50−55
0−1
medium / 768p
30−35
−
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 768p
100−105
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
high / 768p
50−55
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 6000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 6000
Quadro K1000M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
GF100
N14P-Q1
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
10 December 2010
1 June 2012
Pipelines
448
192
Core clock speed
574 MHz
850 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
13.60
Floating-point performance
1,027.7 gflops
326.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2988 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
143.4 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
2.0
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
91 Mh/s
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price