Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K1000M
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro K1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 140% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K1000M has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 250 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 900% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro FX 3800 and Quadro K1000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Fortnite is 90% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Quadro K1000M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | N14P-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |