Quadro K1000M vs Quadro K2200M
When comparing Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 44% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
- Both video cards are using MXM-A (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 183 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 3212 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | − | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 296% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 468% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 62% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro K1000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N14P-Q1 | GM107 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 667 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |