Quadro K1000M vs Quadro K3000M

When comparing Quadro K1000M and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K1000M and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Quadro K3000M Check Price

Quadro K1000M and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro K1000M and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Quadro K3000M here:

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Quadro K3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K3000M has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K3000M are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 196 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Quadro K1000M and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	60−65	140−150
medium / 768p	27−30	120−130
ultra / 1080p	7−8	55−60
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	16−18	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 275% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	10−11	65−70
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	10−11
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 204% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
low / 768p	18−20	55−60
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	7−8
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
low / 768p	0−1	27−30
medium / 768p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
high / 768p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Quadro K3000M
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	N14P-Q1	N14E-Q1
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 June 2012	1 June 2012
Pipelines	192	576
Core clock speed	850 MHz	654 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	31.39
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	753.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	10 Mh/s	24 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Optimus	+	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M vs Quadro K3000M

Quadro K1000M and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares