Quadro K1000M vs Quadro P3200

In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Quadro P3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro P3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Quadro P3200 Check Price

Quadro K1000M and Quadro P3200 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro K1000M and Quadro P3200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Quadro P3200 here:

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Quadro P3200 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Quadro P3200
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6084 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro P3200 has 6082 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 142 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 5208 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	20−22
4K / 2160p	−	10−12
low / 720p	1−2	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6600% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	55−60
QHD / 1440p	0−1	40−45
4K / 2160p	−	21−24
low / 720p	0−1	110−120
medium / 1080p	−	70−75
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
Quadro K1000M and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	250−260
medium / 768p	27−30	220−230
ultra / 1080p	7−8	190−200
QHD / 1440p	−	120−130
4K / 2160p	−	80−85
high / 768p	16−18	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 692% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro K1000M and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	50−55
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 720p	0−1	85−90
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	−	65−70
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	21−24	190−200
medium / 1080p	0−1	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 786% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	65−70
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	0−1	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	70−75
low / 768p	18−20	140−150
medium / 768p	−	130−140
high / 1080p	0−1	75−80
ultra / 1080p	−	35−40
QHD / 1440p	0−1	27−30
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	110−120
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1337% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	0−1	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	40−45
low / 768p	0−1	140−150
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	−	50−55
ultra / 1080p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	55−60
high / 768p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Quadro P3200
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Code name	N14P-Q1	N18E-Q1
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 June 2012	27 February 2017
Pipelines	192	1792
Core clock speed	850 MHz	708 - 1202 MHz
Boost Clock		1228 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	10 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Optimus	+	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M vs Quadro P3200

Quadro K1000M and Quadro P3200 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares