Quadro K1000M vs Quadro P620

In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Quadro P620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Quadro P620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Quadro P620 Check Price

Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Quadro P620
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	40 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M has 12% more power consumption, than Quadro P620.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro P620 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P620 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro P620 - in Desktops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P620 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P620 is 327 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P620 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P620 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K1000M and Quadro P620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	220−230
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	80−85
4K / 2160p	−	40−45
high / 768p	16−18	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro K1000M and Quadro P620 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	−	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	35−40
low / 768p	18−20	100−105
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 436% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	65−70
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	40−45
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Quadro P620
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Code name	N14P-Q1	GP107
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 June 2012	27 May 2019
Pipelines	192	512
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost Clock		1442 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	43.33
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,490 gflops
Length		145 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	80.13 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	10 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
Optimus	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M vs Quadro P620

Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares