Quadro K1000M vs Radeon E8860
When comparing Quadro K1000M and Radeon E8860, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K1000M and Radeon E8860 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon E8860
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M | Radeon E8860 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 37 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Quadro K1000M has 21% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon E8860 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K1000M and Radeon E8860 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 275 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K1000M and Radeon E8860 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 2700 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Dota 2 is 148% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E8860 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro K1000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M | Radeon E8860 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14P-Q1 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 25 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |