Quadro K1000M vs Radeon Pro 460

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K1000M stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Radeon Pro 460 Check Price

Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Radeon Pro 460 here:

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Radeon Pro 460 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M has 28% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 50 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	60−65	220−230
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	35−40
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 422% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Radeon Pro 460
Architecture	Kepler	Polaris
Code name	N14P-Q1	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 June 2012	8 August 2016
Pipelines	192	1024
Core clock speed	850 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		907 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	58.05
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,858 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	81.28 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+
FreeSync		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	10 Mh/s	227 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Optimus	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon Pro 460

Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares