Quadro K1000M vs Radeon Pro 555

When comparing Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 555, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 555 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Radeon Pro 555 Check Price

Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 555 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 555 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Radeon Pro 555 here:

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Radeon Pro 555 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Radeon Pro 555
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon Pro 555 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro 555 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 555 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 555 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 5 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 555 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 555 is 3280 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	30−35
medium / 1080p	0−1	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	27−30
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p	60−65	210−220
medium / 768p	27−30	180−190
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	55−60
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	16−18	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 555.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	95−100
ultra / 1080p	0−1	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	100−110
medium / 1080p	0−1	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Fortnite is 377% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 720p	8−9	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	0−1	55−60
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 555 in World of Tanks is 200% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Radeon Pro 555
Architecture	Kepler	Polaris
Code name	N14P-Q1	Polaris 21
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 June 2012	5 June 2017
Pipelines	192	768
Core clock speed	850 MHz	855 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	40.80
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,306 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	81.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+
FreeSync		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	10 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Optimus	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon Pro 555

Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro 555 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares