Quadro K1000M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K1000M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 44% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 232 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
1−2
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
60−65
190−200
medium / 768p
27−30
160−170
ultra / 1080p
7−8
85−90
QHD / 1440p
−
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
10−11
85−90
ultra / 1080p
0−1
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
90−95
medium / 1080p
0−1
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 318% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
low / 768p
18−20
75−80
medium / 768p
−
65−70
high / 1080p
0−1
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−105
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
8−9
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
0−1
45−50
medium / 768p
−
27−30
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
30−35
high / 768p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Quadro K1000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14P-Q1
Polaris 12
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
26 September 2019
Pipelines
192
640
Core clock speed
850 MHz
1082 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
13.60
41.44
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price