Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R7 250X

    When comparing Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 250X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 250X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Quadro K1000M Check Price
    Radeon R7 250X Check Price

    Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:

    Quadro K1000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      Quadro K1000M Radeon R7 250X
    Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 80 Watt
    Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin
    Memory type DDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Radeon R7 250X has 77% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
    • Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R7 250X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 250X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
    • Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 250X - in Desktops.
    • Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 250X - with GCN 1.0.
    • Quadro K1000M and Radeon R7 250X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 175 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250X.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 0−1 10−12
    ultra / 1080p − 6−7
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 1−2
    low / 720p 1−2 24−27
    medium / 1080p 0−1 14−16
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Quadro K1000M.

    Full Specs

      Quadro K1000M Radeon R7 250X
    Architecture Kepler GCN 1.0
    Code name N14P-Q1 Cape Verde
    Type Mobile workstation Desktop
    Release date 1 June 2012 13 February 2014
    Pipelines 192 640
    Core clock speed 850 MHz
    Boost Clock 1000 MHz
    Transistor count 1,270 million 1,500 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 13.60 38.00
    Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops 1,216 gflops
    Length 210 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1625 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s 96 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 5.1 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.126
    CUDA +
    FreeSync +
    Bus support PCIe 3.0
    HDMI +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 10 Mh/s 152 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
    Optimus +
    Eyefinity +
    Design reference
    CrossFire +
    DDMA audio +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares