FirePro S7000 vs Quadro K1100M
When comparing FirePro S7000 and Quadro K1100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro K1100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro K1100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 677% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K1100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 245 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro K1100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 337% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 425% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
FirePro S7000 and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 114% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 640% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 243% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 360% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 425% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro K1100M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro K1100M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Pitcairn | GK107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 705 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 22.59 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 18 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |