FirePro W8100 vs Quadro K1100M
When choosing between FirePro W8100 and Quadro K1100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W8100 and Quadro K1100M.
FirePro W8100
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Quadro K1100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 388% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K1100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 119 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- FirePro W8100 and Quadro K1100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 550% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 762% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
FirePro W8100 and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 130% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 1080% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 317% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 620% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 14−16 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 812% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Quadro K1100M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Quadro K1100M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Hawaii | GK107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 705 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 22.59 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 18 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |